At 12:40 PM -0500 1/15/02, Chris Nandor wrote: >In article <p05100303b8692d0d7508@[192.168.1.104]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kee Hinckley) wrote: > >> The nice thing about this approach is that writing the initial glue >> shouldn't be a big deal. Handling every possible object is a lot of >> work, but it can be built incrementally. Anytime someone needs to >> handle a new type of object they simply add the relevant Applescript >> and Perl code to the libraries. >> >> Is any of this making sense? > >I'm not sure, but it seems a lot more complex than simply dropping an >application on a droplet and then coding to it in Perl, bypassing >AppleScript altogether.
Somehow I missed this the first time round. I guess I'm not sure what you mean by that sentence. My goal is to be able to write an event-driven Perl program that is taking information from the UI, and passing information back. Ideally *not* by execing the Perl program everytime. -- Kee Hinckley - Somewhere.Com, LLC http://consulting.somewhere.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept responsibility for their own actions, or that they are so eager to regulate everyone else's.
