>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dan> A few seem to have missed the fact that Randal sent a private message Dan> to Puneet. This isn't acceptable regardless of the point, context, or Dan> argument. It should have remained private. The rest is between them. For clarification, the "this isn't acceptable" was Puneet's reposting of my private mail to the list, not the fact that I sent a private message. Correct? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
