Is there any reason you would NEED to compile it fat? Does anybody
expect that the same partition will boot on both x386 and PowerPC macs?
Ian
On Jun 7, 2005, at 5:32 AM, Sherm Pendley wrote:
On Jun 7, 2005, at 5:19 AM, Gisle Aas wrote:
Why would it be painful to compile perl and its modules as a fat
binaries?
*If* Apple compiles a fat perl ...
and *if* that fat perl doesn't require me to buy an Intel/Mac with
money I don't have ...
and *if* that fat perl is configured properly to produce fat XS
modules ...
and *if* the ffcall library that CamelBones uses is updated to
support Darwin/x86 calling conventions ...
