At 11:16 AM -0500 1/24/01, Chris Nandor wrote:
>At 16:53 +0100 01.24.2001, Bart Lateur wrote:
>>On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 10:09:24 -0500, Chris Nandor wrote:
>>
>>>>With the MacPerl 5.6.0 (alpha) release on the horizon (the next days?
>>>>:), we will see if there are any things that need to be changed or
>>>>added.
>>>
>>>I plan a source release RSN. Hopefully this week.
>>
>>Not to be a spoilsport...
>>
>>I recently read several messages on the Perl6 mailing lists, as if 5.6.0
>>wasn't really "ready for prime time". It was "realeased too early", and
>>"not very stable". All text between quotes are just paraphrases, but you
>>get the gist.
>
>I disagree. I use it quite a bit for my own stuff with no problems at all.
>I find no problems with stability. The only problems I ever had with it
>were when it was first released, and some modules did not work with it. In
>fact, I daresay Apache 1.3.14 + mod_perl 1.24_01 + perl 5.6.0 is the most
>stable setup I've ever had. I don't read
I agree. I've been using 5.6.0 since it came out on three different
Unix flavors with no problems.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--
>Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/
>Open Source Development Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/
--
--
Paul Schinder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
