At 11:54 -0500 01.24.2001, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 11:16:49AM -0500, Chris Nandor wrote:
>> At 16:53 +0100 01.24.2001, Bart Lateur wrote:
>> >I recently read several messages on the Perl6 mailing lists, as if 5.6.0
>> >wasn't really "ready for prime time". It was "realeased too early", and
>> >"not very stable". All text between quotes are just paraphrases, but you
>> >get the gist.
>>
>> I disagree. I use it quite a bit for my own stuff with no problems at all.
>> I find no problems with stability. The only problems I ever had with it
>> were when it was first released, and some modules did not work with it. In
>> fact, I daresay Apache 1.3.14 + mod_perl 1.24_01 + perl 5.6.0 is the most
>> stable setup I've ever had.
>
>Regardless of whether 5.6.0 was released "too early", there are known bugs
>in 5.6.0 that could affect production code. I hope that the next lasting
>release of MacPerl will not be perl5.6.0.
Ronald, could you tell us what those are, or point us to a reference?
Please respond to the -porters list if you are on it. Thanks,
--
Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/
