on 01/31/2001 07:31 AM, Chris Nandor at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 05:58 -0500 01.31.2001, Scott R. Godin wrote:
>> on 01/31/2001 04:54 AM, KIMURA Takeshi at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Morbus Iff wrote on 01.1.30 1:45 PM:
>>>> Do you SSH through CVS on the Mac? How? I've been requesting pserver for my
>>>> perl projects on SourceForge, and up until last month, things were happy
>>>> and they responded quickly. But a request for pserver from last December
>>>> still hasn't been pushed through.
>>>
>>> I wish if SourceForge could support IE for Mac.
>>> Is it going to?
>>
>> IE ?
>>
>> IE doesn't even know that disabled="false" means FALSE in an Html popup menu
>> in a <form> section. not even IE 5.5 ! =:o
>
> I don't know of any 'disabled="false"' for select elements. You can use
> 'disabled' without any value:
>
> <form>
> <select><option>a</option><option>b</option></select>
> <select disabled><option>c</option><option>d</option></select>
> </form>
>
> That is proper HTML, and works fine in IE 5.0. It does not work in
> Netscape 4.x.
hmm.. Guess I need to study the CGI.pm docs a little more carefully. Could
have sworn that disabled took a true/false attribute instead of just BEING a
boolean itself (which WOULD make more practical sense)
>> get iCab.. WAY mo bettah
>>
>> http://www.icab.de/
>
> iCab is quite buggy and incomplete, being a preview release. There is
> absolutely no CSS support, and it crashes far too often for me. IE does
> not crash on me; its big problem (aside from its problems with SSL) is some
> sort of problem whereby if you leave it running for too long, it gets very
> very slow, and you need to quit it and try again.
> I keep trying iCab every time a new release comes out, but it proves to be
> unusable for me each time, at this stage.
the whole point of the preview releases is so that bugs can get reported..
did you?
With the exception of one earlier release they've all been working fine for
me (although the lack of CSS support is an annoyance, I still have Netscape
4.7 aroound)
> Netscape 4.x is slightly more stable, but it is far less Mac-like, and is
> also way behind in features (although, at least, you can now use MRJ with
> that special plugin).
>
> Netscape 6 is just completely broken and unusable, IMO.
so far I haven't bothered with any Netscape > 4.7
> So, for now, I stick with the most complete and usable browser, which, for
> me, is IE 5.
>
> When does IE 5.5 come out?
That I don't know.. I was under the impression that it was already out.
And on yet another note, can we make this mailing list set the reply-to to
be the LIST and not the PERSON? If I want to send it to the person THEN I
would figure on doing the jiggery-pokery to "reply to all" but it's an
annoyance to have to do this every time, and also to see every single reply
twice (because it got mailed to me and cc'd to the LIST)
Thus I am sending this to the LIST instead of BOTH the list AND your private
mail. I assume you read the list occasionally? oh good. :) heehee
--
Scott R. Godin | e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Laughing Dragon Services | web : http://www.webdragon.net/
