At 21:17 +0100 01.31.2001, Terje Bless wrote: >On 31.01.01 at 14:16, Scott R. Godin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>hmm.. Guess I need to study the CGI.pm docs a little more carefully. Could >>have sworn that disabled took a true/false attribute instead of just BEING >>a boolean itself (which WOULD make more practical sense) > >It does. It's a matter of attribute shorting and IE being "clever". In the HTML 4.0 spec, I could find no evidence of "disbled" taking a value. >Interviewer: In what language do you write your algorithms? >Abigail: English. >Interviewer: What would you do if, say, Telnet didn't work? >Abigail: Look at the error message. lol! What's that from? -- Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/ Open Source Development Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/
- [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State of MacPerl) Scott R. Godin
- [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State of MacPer... Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State of Ma... Terje Bless
- Re: [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State of Ma... Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State of Ma... Terje Bless
- Re: [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State o... Chris Nandor
- Re: [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State of Ma... Bruce Van Allen
- Re: [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State of Ma... Ronald J Kimball
- Re: [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State o... Lincoln Stein
- Re: [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State of Ma... Ronald J Kimball
- Re: [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State o... Scott R. Godin
- Re: [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State of Ma... Scott R. Godin
- Re: [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State o... Lincoln Stein
- Re: [MacPerl] Re: OT: Browsers (was: The State of Ma... Scott R. Godin