At 21:17 +0100 01.31.2001, Terje Bless wrote:
>On 31.01.01 at 14:16, Scott R. Godin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>hmm.. Guess I need to study the CGI.pm docs a little more carefully. Could
>>have sworn that disabled took a true/false attribute instead of just BEING
>>a boolean itself (which WOULD make more practical sense)
>
>It does. It's a matter of attribute shorting and IE being "clever".

In the HTML 4.0 spec, I could find no evidence of "disbled" taking a value.


>Interviewer: In what language do you write your algorithms?
>Abigail:     English.
>Interviewer: What would you do if, say, Telnet didn't work?
>Abigail:     Look at the error message.

lol!  What's that from?

-- 
Chris Nandor                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]    http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network    [EMAIL PROTECTED]     http://osdn.com/

Reply via email to