On 31.01.01 at 14:16, Scott R. Godin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>hmm.. Guess I need to study the CGI.pm docs a little more carefully. Could
>have sworn that disabled took a true/false attribute instead of just BEING
>a boolean itself (which WOULD make more practical sense)
It does. It's a matter of attribute shorting and IE being "clever".
>> When does IE 5.5 come out?
>
>That I don't know.. I was under the impression that it was already out.
On `doze. The Mac version is still off in limbo. Has been for ages.
>And on yet another note, can we make this mailing list set the reply-to to
>be the LIST and not the PERSON?
Please, no, don't even think about it! It's abusing the Reply-To field and
sabotaging the function of MUAs everywhere. If your MUA doesn't make it
easy to do what you want to do, find one that does; don't ruin the party
for everyone else. _Please_ read the document at
<URL:http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>, and _understand_ it
before even /considering/ this option!
--
Interviewer: In what language do you write your algorithms?
Abigail: English.
Interviewer: What would you do if, say, Telnet didn't work?
Abigail: Look at the error message.
