on 02/01/2001 10:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>> for everyone else. _Please_ read the document at
>> <URL:http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>, and _understand_ it
> 
> While I agree with the idea of minimal munging and why the reply-to
> might be unwise, IMO 'reply to all recepients' is NOT the answer with
> mailing lists.  What if you have 100 or 1000 people on the list?  That's
> going to be an awfully big header if it includes all the address-ees.  I
> have noticed that there is a 'List Post' header field (I notive MacPerl
> list uses it), which I'd use in this case.  Neither of the two mail
> progs I use (admittedly Netscape and Eudora aren't the best..) use this
> though (AFAIK); I assume it's a relatively new addition to the mail RFC.
> 
> Jim


all I want, when I hit the "reply" button to a message that came FROM the
list is that the reply go TO the list unless I so otherwise designate.

as it is now, I have to

    click the to:
    remove the person there
    add the macPerl list back in
    close the to:

heck with that! 

if I *WANTED* TO CC: THE ORIGINAL POSTER I WOULD DO SO. (was that clear
enough or does it bear repeating?)

I am IN NO WAY talking about "including all the recipients of the mailing
list in the TO field" (that's just stupid!)

I am talking about 'reply to all' (obviously) including both
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (normal reply-to field) and <original poster's e-mail>
(from field) and 

THAT

       IS
            IT

capice?

I have NO idea how such a simple and straightforward statement could have
possibly been misconstrued.

REPLY-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

it's so very simple.

I find it terribly annoying to recieve TWO copies of each message because
the user also has to add-back the MacPerl list if they want others to see it
too. (waste of time that adds up more and more each time I have to deal with
this silliness)

Can I be ANY clearer about this?

</rant mode> =:) 

<begging pleading hand-wringing>
*PLEASE PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD FIX THIS!* :D
</begging pleading hand-wringing>

-- 
Scott R. Godin            | e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Laughing Dragon Services  |    web : http://www.webdragon.net/


Reply via email to