on 02/02/2001 01:43 AM, Rich Lafferty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On the other hand, if the mailing list doesn't throw away the original
> Reply-To, then you've got all the addresses you need: the From: to say
> where it originated, the To: to say how to reply to the list, and the
> Reply-To: to say how to reply to the poster.
>
> For someone that uses mailing lists regularly, a mail client which
> differentiates between replying to sender and replying to list strikes
> me as a prerequisite.
ahhhhh ok I see what you're getting at now.. and in light of that, it does
make a lot of sense..
I'll look into the other person's suggestion of the "mailing list handling"
features of outlook express and see whether it will work that way.
thanks for taking the time to explain your position clearly enough
it makes sense now :)
--
Scott R. Godin | e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Laughing Dragon Services | web : http://www.webdragon.net/
