At 7:21 AM -0600 3/2/01, Jeff Lowrey wrote:
>At 11:02 AM +0100 3/2/01, Bart Lateur wrote:
>>On Thu, 1 Mar 2001 18:39:38 -0800, Peter Savage wrote:
>>
>>>I'm using perl to automate testing (an executable that makes calls
>>>into a library), and all the perl scripted testing broke when the
>>>test tool was carbonized. The conclusion is that one can't call into
>>>a carbon based thing from a non carbon based thing. Perhaps this is a
>>>bogus conclusion?
>>
>>Hmmm... what does "carbonized" mean? Have the line endings changed?
>
>"Carbonized" means re-written to use the cleaned up Mac API 
>"Carbon". Line endings haven't changed.  However, it's possible that 
>the new carbon Program-to-program communications libraries don't 
>talk properly to the old PPC libraries.


Anyway, before I jumped into the fray in an attempt to carbonize my 
copy of MacPerl, I was wondering if someone had already done it. 
Also, if and when I complete it, if anyone is interested in a copy.

Best Regards,

Peter

Reply via email to