On Jul 17, 2009, at 01:40, William Siegrist wrote:
On Jul 16, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 09:50, William Siegrist wrote:
On Jul 14, 2009, at 7:26 AM, Kristofer Henriksson wrote:
It seems that some are simply opposed to XHTML. Is there a
particular
reason to dislike using it for the site?
http://webkit.org/blog/68/understanding-html-xml-and-xhtml/
If you're suggesting that document as a basis for using HTML
instead of XHTML, then I would want to see a newer document on the
topic; that one is from September 2006 and the web changes rather
quickly.
Ok, join #webkit on freenode and ask them for their current
opinion. Or I can go bump the date on that blog post, whichever you
prefer. :) Seriously, though, that is still their opinion on the
matter, and they have some expertise in this area.
Ok, that's good to know. I wouldn't expend energy converting our
current site back to HTML 4.01 but we can keep it in mind for the
next rewrite of the site (or use HTML 5 if the specification is
finished by that time). I tentatively agree with those who were wary
of using HTML 5 now, before the spec is finished.
_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-dev
