On Jul 1, 2013, at 11:00 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:

>>> and also ensure using the active_variants portgroup that the variant 
>>> selected in each port is the same as the variant used in the intltool port?
>> 
>> Again, why would that be?
> 
> Because all ports using intltool are already required to add this line:
> 
> INTLTOOL_PERL=${prefix}/bin/perl5.12

Gah... That is stupid.  Why was this hackery propagated so far.  The real fix 
should be fixing that stupid autoconf macro and autoreconf-ing those ports.

>>> It was much more straightforward when the intltool port (and any other port 
>>> that uses perl or perl modules) simply used perl 5.12.
>> 
>> Yes, straight forward so long as you used +perl5_12.  If you used a 
>> non-default perl, you were out of luck.
> 
> It should have worked, provided each port correctly specified that it wanted 
> to use perl5.12. Granted there are many ports that do not correctly do this 
> at present.

Well it didn't … and I'd rather fix it correctly than hack around the problem 
in other ports.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
macports-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

Reply via email to