On Jul 2, 2013, at 5:29 PM, Dan Ports <[email protected]> wrote: > This seems like yet another instance of the current perl situation > making it harder to maintain other ports.
yep > Are we really getting enough benefit out of supporting multiple perl > versions to make this worthwhile? nope On Jul 4, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Joshua Root <[email protected]> wrote: > Or if the relevant maintainers want to remove the old perl versions or > just have one version, that's fine with me. this I've been saying for a while that we should just have one perl5 port (that has the latest stable perl5), and set all p5-xx ports to use this perl. If people want, older perl5.X.Y ports could exist (but I'm not sure there's any need for them). -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- [email protected] ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+ _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
