On 6 October 2016 at 14:40, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Thursday October 06 2016 07:17:18 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> I don't understand... Those two paragraphs seem contradictory. You say it 
>> works without libc++, and that forcing libc++ would cause the ports to fail 
>> (on vanilla OS X < 10.9), but then you say it would help to use libc++.
> I guess that Mojca means that there will probably be less issues with Qt5 
> ports in general if we forced the use of libc++ across the board.

No, this is not what I was trying to say.

Pushing for libc++ would be a good idea anyway, but an independent
one. The only blocking stone is meeting the agreement about how to
name the new binary archives [and implementing that] :)

macports-dev mailing list

Reply via email to