On 6 October 2016 at 14:40, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > On Thursday October 06 2016 07:17:18 Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> I don't understand... Those two paragraphs seem contradictory. You say it >> works without libc++, and that forcing libc++ would cause the ports to fail >> (on vanilla OS X < 10.9), but then you say it would help to use libc++. > > I guess that Mojca means that there will probably be less issues with Qt5 > ports in general if we forced the use of libc++ across the board.
No, this is not what I was trying to say. Pushing for libc++ would be a good idea anyway, but an independent one. The only blocking stone is meeting the agreement about how to name the new binary archives [and implementing that] :) Mojca _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
