On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:25 PM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, that hasn't yet caused me any problems on Linux. I've made the > v6 collection the default as soon as it became available, and certainly > haven't had to rebuild anything because of it. You haven't seen the work distribution folks do to fit this stuff together. They've been doing it since early versions of g++ where libstdc++ wasn't even ABI compatible with *itself* across versions, so they're used to it by now. At my previous job, when we ran into this we just lifted the whole thing to glue multiple g++ releases to a common libstdc++ from Debian (clang / libc++ wasn't an issue back then). -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
