On Mar 11, 2018, at 10:15, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2018-03-09 15:21, Joshua Root wrote: >> On 2018-3-9 20:38 , db wrote: >>> On 9 Mar 2018, at 01:27, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>>> When would we run this script to delete libstdc++ archives? Presumably, >>>> after all legacy users have MacPorts 2.5 and have switched to libc++. >>> >>> How about those that build MP from source? >> >> There are no additional problems arising from that, whether you mean >> building base from source or building all ports from source. In fact >> there's one less problem if you're not downloading any binary archives, >> as you can't get ones that are built for the wrong cxx_stdlib. > > I think we should use cxx_stdlib as one additional criteria to respect > when selecting an archive site here: > > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/master/_resources/port1.0/fetch/archive_sites.tcl > > https://github.com/macports/macports-base/blob/995dde8476c48580db4f6eedfde09e90dc5e8c99/src/package1.0/portarchivefetch.tcl#L66 > > Then the archive site would no longer be used if anyone changes the > default in macports.conf.
Yes, absolutely, and we need to do the same for delete_la_files.