On 2018-03-12, at 4:26 PM, Kenneth F. Cunningham wrote:
> It _could_ be done in 10.5 Intel, but that makes not much sense. Nobody 
> should be running 10.5 intel anyway, and if we made the libc++ switch in 10.5 
> intel we'd be endlessly trying to figure out if we're on 10.5 PPC (libstdc++) 
> or 10.5 intel (libc++) and -- ugh. 

Also, I guess universal binaries Intel/PPC on 10.5 would be in a terrible mess 
if we had Intel on libc++ and PPC on libstdc++.


Reply via email to