On 2018-03-12, at 4:15 PM, Kenneth F. Cunningham <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 2018-03-12, at 4:26 PM, Kenneth F. Cunningham wrote: >> >> >> It _could_ be done in 10.5 Intel, but that makes not much sense. Nobody >> should be running 10.5 intel anyway, and if we made the libc++ switch in >> 10.5 intel we'd be endlessly trying to figure out if we're on 10.5 PPC >> (libstdc++) or 10.5 intel (libc++) and -- ugh. > > Also, I guess universal binaries Intel/PPC on 10.5 would be in a terrible > mess if we had Intel on libc++ and PPC on libstdc++. Is there a reason for a universal binary on PPC anymore? Anyone running a PPC binary today will either be on a PPC machine (10.5), or an Intel machine with Rosetta (10.6). They either want a 10.5 PPC binary, or a 10.6 Intel binary. So is there any reason for a PPC universal build today? --- Entertaining minecraft videos http://YouTube.com/keybounce
