> On 2010-6-1 05:48 , Chris Jones wrote: >> Does it make sense that atlas requires two different compilers ?? >> > It doesn't actually, the flat registry just thinks it does. > <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/13054> > > The default compiler used by atlas was recently switched from gcc43 to > gcc44, which is additionally problematic in that this causes multiple > gcc versions to be installed when installing some ports. > <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25081> > > - Josh
Is there a downside to having atlas depend on gcc44 while everything else depends on gcc43? Also, is it "worthwhile" to eliminate this errant dependency now, rather than later (presumably by removing and reinstalling atlas)? I would guess that upcoming changes in 1.9 will not retroactively solve such problems... Scott PS Is there any way to respond to a thread "properly" if you receive digested mails from this list? I assume that my just editing the subject will not be sufficient for proper threading, we'll see... _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
