On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Chris Jones wrote: > Hi, > >> Is there a downside to having atlas depend on gcc44 while everything >> else depends on gcc43? > > Its just a little annoying that a package like atlas, which is a dependency > of a dependency.... drags in a big build like gcc when I have no other reason > for it... I understand that some packages may need a newer compiler than the > standard OSX ones, but it would be nice if they could agree on which one ;)
I was wondering why anything depends on atlas at all. Is atlas noticeably better than the lapack and blas routines in the Accelerate framework? I couldn't find any comparisons on-line. -- Steve -- -- [email protected] Tel: (301) 975-5423 -- -- http://math.nist.gov/mcsd/Staff/SLanger/ Fax: (301) 975-3553 -- -- NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8910, Gaithersburg, Md 20899-8910 -- -- "I don't think this will work. That's why it's science." -- -- Naomi Langer (age 6), 17 Feb 2003 -- _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
