On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 18:37, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
>> That was a while ago so maybe it's time we revisit this? With my
>> py25-numpy and py2{5,6}-scipy maintainers hat on I'd vote for a switch
>> to gcc44 as the default compiler for scientific ports.
>
> Great! Now we're getting somewhere. :)
>
> Before we go updating everything to gcc44, let's make sure gcc44 works
> everywhere we need it to.
>
> Do we have any thoughts on the ticket where gcc44 can't be built on Tiger
> Intel? Anybody else see that problem or is it only on my machine? Do we care
> about Tiger anymore?
>
> http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20753
I haven't had access to a Tiger machine for a while, plus it's no
longer supported by Apple...
> What about this ticket where gcc44 can't be built on (some?) Leopard
> machines? Anybody else see this problem?
>
> http://trac.macports.org/ticket/20635
I originally reported this ticket, but I successfully built gcc44 on
both an Intel and PPC Leopard machines earlier this week. Can't recall
when this started working for me, this one fell of my radar (probably
when I updated by main machine to Snow Leopard).
Cheers
Adam
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
