On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Ryan Schmidt <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Do we already record the C++ runtime in the registry with each installed
> port? If not, we should do that, in addition to getting it into the binary
> filenames. And just as we do for architectures, maybe we should have an
> indication for software that doesn't use any C++ runtime ("nocxx"?).
>
Right up until something can use a plugin built against C++, since that
would only show up at runtime if it's dlopen()ed.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
[email protected] [email protected]
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
