On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > > All this talk about keeping track of C++ runtimes and switching to libc++ is > dangerous because it proposes a huge amount of work that deftly dances around > the actual problem.
It's not a huge amount of work. It already works. The question is about providing a buildbot with binaries. (Personally I'm not willing to keep recompiling Qt, clang and all other software just to get libc++ working.) What do you mean with "dancing around the actual problem"? The problem is that the default libstdc++ on < 10.9 doesn't have support for C++11. (But yes, the use of GPLv3 has something to do with the issue. The version of libstdc++ that supports C++11 no longer provides a suitable licence for Apple.) Mojca _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
