On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:07 PM, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ah yes, never occured to me tht there might be a man port as well. thank > you for this solution. regarding "satisfactory": for my personal use, yes > it is. generally, I'd say no, since it seems osx's man does something > wrong/non-canonical, no? > Probably means Apple ships older groff and newer programs' manpages expect a newer groff. I've seen a fair number of groff warnings to that extent. -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
