> On Oct 13, 2016, at 20:00, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > > On Oct 13, 2016, at 16:58, Richard L. Hamilton <rlha...@smart.net> wrote: >> >> This was a build prerequisite for py27-numpy, so I can't build that either. >> It failed both with and without +universal (I think I have the latter set as >> default). > > For some reason the 10.6 x86_64 builder didn't build it either so we didn't > have a gcc6-6.2.0_0.darwin_10.x86_64.tbz2 package. It's not easy to find old > buildbot logs so I don't know if it failed because of the same bootstrap > failure you saw or for some other reason. > > Josh forced a build now, and it built successfully, so if you clean and try > again, without the universal variant, you'll get the package from us without > having to compile it yourself. >
That worked, thanks! I see that a similar situation applied to gcc49 and dpkg, that I couldn't build them for myself with +universal, but pre-built binaries were available without it. That might well apply to the other things that aren't building for me too, except they're libraries, and I already have a bunch of dependencies on them in place, so that wouldn't be a good idea unless I redid everything without universal. _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
