I don’t know if it helps at all, but on October 24th I did the first steps of MacPorts migration in anticipation of installing Catalina. I never did install Catalina, but I saved the myports.txt and requested.txt files. They are here:
https://pastebin.com/cxM85Dq6 <https://pastebin.com/cxM85Dq6> https://pastebin.com/8sJafzKa <https://pastebin.com/8sJafzKa> This is before I did the reclaim that removed clamav. > On Nov 9, 2019, at 09:40, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > > > > On Nov 8, 2019, at 20:31, Chris Jones wrote: > >> On 9 Nov 2019, at 1:39 am, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >>> If you ran `sudo port install clamav`, and it was not already installed, >>> MacPorts should have marked it as requested. If clamav was automatically >>> installed as a dependency of something else, then it would not have been >>> marked requested. >> >> That sounds like something we should fix to me. Is it not reasonable to >> expect the port in this case, even if it was previously installed as a >> dependency, to still be marked as requested in this case, as that is what >> the user did by asking for it to be installed. The fact it already was >> shouldn’t matter in terms of marking it as requested ? > > If you mean that running `sudo port install` on a port that is already > installed should mark it as requested, then that's > https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55085. >
