>> And given that Apple doesn't hesitate to squelch tech when it feels like it, 
>> I'm clear that committing to any technology it hasn't blessed is "at your 
>> own risk."

While this is partly true, I don't see what Apple could realistically
do to hurt MacRuby developers (and why they would do that).
Actually, the fact that MacRuby doesn't ship as a public framework in
Lion is a blessing in disguise since developers don't have to wait for
Apple's blessing to use the latest version of the framework.

So, the only valid argument I personally agree with is the current
lack of iOS support, but even that, writing OS X and iOS apps is quite
different and I don't think many people only use one code base for
both platforms.

- Matt


On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Bryan Harrison <br...@bryanharrison.com> wrote:
> Those are all interesting and useful points and I appreciate everyone's 
> willing to respond at length.  As always, I wonder why extraordinary 
> generosity isn't part of the geek stereotype.
>
> Since I'm interested in developing for both OS X and iOS, "no Ruby on iOS" is 
> the clincher.  And given that Apple doesn't hesitate to squelch tech when it 
> feels like it, I'm clear that committing to any technology it hasn't blessed 
> is "at your own risk."
>
> Still, MacRuby is very promising.  I'll keep an eye out.
>
> Thanks again,
> Bryan
> _______________________________________________
> MacRuby-devel mailing list
> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
>
_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

Reply via email to