On Dec 20, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Kevin Poorman wrote:

> I wonder if we couldn't kickstarter a fund to let apple hire someone full 
> time to do macruby work?

MacRuby is an open source project and, as such, is (and always has been) free 
to seek or employ additional resources entirely on its own; it does not need 
Apple to hand-hold or broker such an arrangement, assuming that such was even 
possible or desirable.

While it is also true that Apple has historically put a fair amount of energy 
into MacRuby, playing a significant role in bootstrapping it to the (IMO, quite 
functional) state it is in today, the greater MacRuby community should 
certainly not take this in any way as an indication that it should simply wait 
passively on the sidelines vs taking an active role in determining its future.  
MacRuby, just as with pretty much every other dialect or implementation of 
Ruby, is not (or at least shouldn't be) something driven by a single person or 
corporation.  Even Matz himself is not the sole arbiter of what Ruby is or can 
become, it being far more of a group effort at this point, and MacRuby is no 
different.  If it were a bird, I would say that it's spent a fair amount of 
time in the nest, its wings are fully grown, and it's fully capable of flying 
by itself at this point. :)

- Jordan

_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

Reply via email to