I would like to see Laurent and Hipbyte offer a paid version of MacRuby with 
the same pricing structure as RubyMotion. I'd buy it... 

-- 
Shaun



On Thursday, 16 May, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Mark Villacampa wrote:

> I'm a longtime RubyMotion user, and MacRuby user before that. I want to share 
> my view as to what is the current status of MacRuby and what can happen in 
> the future.
> 
> The momentum around MacRuby has been inexistent for almost a year and a half. 
> That is, since Laurent Sansonetti (the original creator of MacRuby) left 
> Apple, and that left the project without maintainers who were being paid to 
> work on it. Only Watson and a couple other maintainers have been doing 
> maintenance work and fixing a couple of bugs.
> 
> Since nobody is being paid to maintain it, and (AFAIK) there is no 
> company/individual whose main/critical systems depended on MacRuby, nobody 
> has taken over the project. This is pretty much a chicken-egg situation.
> 
> That said, a year ago, Laurent launched RubyMotion, a product based on 
> MacRuby which introduces many new features, such as an ARC based memory 
> model, and iOS support (dropping OSX support). Just a few days ago, in the 
> first anniversary of RubyMotion, they introduced OSX support.
> 
> Rubymotion is not open source, and the license costs 200$, plus an annual 
> renewal fee of 99$. Two reasons that people sometimes argue for not investing 
> in RM are:
> 
> - "It's closed source, it might disappear at any moment": Actually, 
> RubyMotion is probably more likely to stay in the long term than MacRuby was 
> at the beginning. Despite Apple being a huge company, MacRuby was kind of an 
> experiment that they could kill at any moment. For HipByte (the company 
> behind Rubymotion), Rubymotion is its main product and the one that pays its 
> employees. They are way more interested in watching RM succeed than Apple was 
> in watching MacRuby succeed.
> 
> - "It's too expensive": for playing around or releasing a pet project or free 
> app that is not one of your ways of income, that might be the case. However, 
> for a company or individual that wants to develop a product from which they 
> hope to get some revenue, that price is ridiculous. I've seen PHP libraries 
> for creating web forms more expensive than RubyMotion (nothing against those 
> libraries). We're talking about a static compiler and a whole toolchain for 
> developing iOS apps. If you're a student and want to play around with 
> RubyMotion, there is a student discount available (send them an email for 
> more information).
> 
> So my conclusion is: If you want to develop OSX applications and you liked 
> MacRuby, invest in getting a RubyMotion license, you probably won't be 
> disappointed.
> 
> Mark.
> 
> 
> On Thursday, May 16, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Christopher S Martin wrote:
> 
> > They recently added support for OS X to rubymotion: 
> > http://blog.rubymotion.com/post/49943751398/rubymotion-goes-2-0-and-gets-os-x-support-templates
> > That said, since rubymotion is (I believe) based off of macruby with some 
> > additions specifically around static compilation of apps, I don't know if 
> > the issues around GC/ARC would be any better in rubymotion on OS X, as I've 
> > only used it for iOS.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Jeff Dyck <fsjj...@gmail.com 
> > (mailto:fsjj...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > Just wanted to add a ditto to this - I'm looking at migrating some old 
> > > AppleScript Studio projects to MacRuby - my initial testing about a year 
> > > ago was great, but it seems the stability of MacRuby as a development 
> > > platform is in question to me at least... I've already been abandoned by 
> > > AppleScript Studio, don't really want to have to go through relearning a 
> > > new language and migrating projects a third time.
> > > 
> > > I'm seeing a few comments on RubyMotion - does that work for developing 
> > > OS X projects as well?  I was under the impression that was for iOS only, 
> > > but I can't say I've looked into it much.
> > > 
> > > Jeff
> > > 
> > > On May 16, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Michael Shantzis <mich...@shantzis.com 
> > > (mailto:mich...@shantzis.com)> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hello all (and especially Carolyn),
> > > >
> > > > I just want to say that I have the same question, specifically 
> > > > regarding the
> > > > GC/ARC issue.
> > > >
> > > > The context in which this came up was very revealing. I had been 
> > > > developing a
> > > > fairly complex Cocoa project (ARC enabled) and decided that I had to 
> > > > add some tests.
> > > > Using MacRuby seemed like the natural solution. I quickly noticed, 
> > > > though, that I
> > > > couldn't.
> > > >
> > > > Is there still any momentum behind MacRuby?  Is there any solution to 
> > > > the issue
> > > > of mixing it with ARC?  I really hope the answer to these two questions 
> > > > is "yes."
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > > Michael Shantzis
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On May 16, 2013, at 8:32 AM, Carolyn Ann Grant 
> > > > <carolyn.ann.gr...@gmail.com (mailto:carolyn.ann.gr...@gmail.com)> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hi, I've got a question about the future of MacRuby. I like it, and 
> > > >> have started working on a project or two using it, but I've been 
> > > >> reading about GC and ARC, Ruby 2.0, RubyMotion and so on, and wonder 
> > > >> where MacRuby is going? I'm quite concerned because I've put a good 
> > > >> amount of time into my MacRuby projects.
> > > >>
> > > >> I wish I had the knowledge and skill to help with MacRuby - I really 
> > > >> do like it! - but unfortunately I don't. I also don't want to invest a 
> > > >> lot of further time in MacRuby if it's not going anywhere. (And I 
> > > >> really can't spare the $200 it would take to buy RubyMotion.)
> > > >>
> > > >> I know this comes across as a bit impertinent, but I really would like 
> > > >> to know what's happening with MacRuby development. Thanks!
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> MacRuby-devel mailing list
> > > >> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org 
> > > >> (mailto:MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org)
> > > >> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > MacRuby-devel mailing list
> > > > MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org 
> > > > (mailto:MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org)
> > > > https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > MacRuby-devel mailing list
> > > MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org 
> > > (mailto:MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org)
> > > https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > MacRuby-devel mailing list
> > MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org 
> > (mailto:MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org)
> > https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MacRuby-devel mailing list
> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org (mailto:MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org)
> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel

Reply via email to