@John Labovitz, you should probably ask that in the Rubymotion mail list or in 
#rubymotion @ freenode on IRC. I dont know the answer, sorry.

Sent from my iPhone

On 16/05/2013, at 21:24, John Labovitz <jo...@johnlabovitz.com> wrote:

> Many of my personal MacRuby projects are somewhat peculiar in that they not 
> only avoid Xcode and Interface builder, they aren't even application bundles. 
> Instead, they're just Ruby files with an executable bit that I run from the 
> command line.
> 
> Do you know whether this mode of development is supported under RubyMotion 
> for OS X apps? Or do they presume that you're building packages?
> 
> --John
> 
> 
> On 16 May 2013, at 11:51 AM, Andy Stechishin <andy.stechis...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> @Shaun: I think RubyMotion 2 is that offering.
>> 
>> @Mark: Well said. I dabbled in MacRuby and thought it would be great if
>> 'they' could get something going for IOS. MY first thought when RubyMotion
>> came out was I needed to buy a license to support HipByte, I have never
>> regretted this and bought my extension last week. The paradigm for
>> RubyMotion has been to step outside the Apple Toolchain to allow developers
>> to produce applications with ease. I am pleased to see this continue in the
>> Cocoa application space. And, the community is almost worth the price of
>> admission alone. :) Heck, I am already giving Apple a hundred bucks a year,
>> so giving Laurent another hundred to actually build in a language I like
>> isn't that much more.
>> 
>> Andy Stechishin (lurker)
>> 
>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Shaun August <saug...@me.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I would like to see Laurent and Hipbyte offer a paid version of MacRuby
>>> with the same pricing structure as RubyMotion. I'd buy it...
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Shaun
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thursday, 16 May, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Mark Villacampa wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm a longtime RubyMotion user, and MacRuby user before that. I want to
>>> share my view as to what is the current status of MacRuby and what can
>>> happen in the future.
>>> 
>>> The momentum around MacRuby has been inexistent for almost a year and a
>>> half. That is, since Laurent Sansonetti (the original creator of MacRuby)
>>> left Apple, and that left the project without maintainers who were being
>>> paid to work on it. Only Watson and a couple other maintainers have been
>>> doing maintenance work and fixing a couple of bugs.
>>> 
>>> Since nobody is being paid to maintain it, and (AFAIK) there is no
>>> company/individual whose main/critical systems depended on MacRuby, nobody
>>> has taken over the project. This is pretty much a chicken-egg situation.
>>> 
>>> That said, a year ago, Laurent launched RubyMotion, a product based on
>>> MacRuby which introduces many new features, such as an ARC based memory
>>> model, and iOS support (dropping OSX support). Just a few days ago, in the
>>> first anniversary of RubyMotion, they introduced OSX support.
>>> 
>>> Rubymotion is not open source, and the license costs 200$, plus an annual
>>> renewal fee of 99$. Two reasons that people sometimes argue for not
>>> investing in RM are:
>>> 
>>> - "It's closed source, it might disappear at any moment": Actually,
>>> RubyMotion is probably more likely to stay in the long term than MacRuby
>>> was at the beginning. Despite Apple being a huge company, MacRuby was kind
>>> of an experiment that they could kill at any moment. For HipByte (the
>>> company behind Rubymotion), Rubymotion is its main product and the one that
>>> pays its employees. They are way more interested in watching RM succeed
>>> than Apple was in watching MacRuby succeed.
>>> 
>>> - "It's too expensive": for playing around or releasing a pet project or
>>> free app that is not one of your ways of income, that might be the case.
>>> However, for a company or individual that wants to develop a product from
>>> which they hope to get some revenue, that price is ridiculous. I've seen
>>> PHP libraries for creating web forms more expensive than RubyMotion
>>> (nothing against those libraries). We're talking about a static compiler
>>> and a whole toolchain for developing iOS apps. If you're a student and want
>>> to play around with RubyMotion, there is a student discount available (send
>>> them an email for more information).
>>> 
>>> So my conclusion is: If you want to develop OSX applications and you liked
>>> MacRuby, invest in getting a RubyMotion license, you probably won't be
>>> disappointed.
>>> 
>>> Mark.
>>> 
>>> On Thursday, May 16, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Christopher S Martin wrote:
>>> 
>>> They recently added support for OS X to rubymotion:
>>> http://blog.rubymotion.com/post/49943751398/rubymotion-goes-2-0-and-gets-os-x-support-templates
>>> That said, since rubymotion is (I believe) based off of macruby with some
>>> additions specifically around static compilation of apps, I don't know if
>>> the issues around GC/ARC would be any better in rubymotion on OS X, as I've
>>> only used it for iOS.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Jeff Dyck <fsjj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Just wanted to add a ditto to this - I'm looking at migrating some old
>>> AppleScript Studio projects to MacRuby - my initial testing about a year
>>> ago was great, but it seems the stability of MacRuby as a development
>>> platform is in question to me at least... I've already been abandoned by
>>> AppleScript Studio, don't really want to have to go through relearning a
>>> new language and migrating projects a third time.
>>> 
>>> I'm seeing a few comments on RubyMotion - does that work for developing OS
>>> X projects as well?  I was under the impression that was for iOS only, but
>>> I can't say I've looked into it much.
>>> 
>>> Jeff
>>> 
>>> On May 16, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Michael Shantzis <mich...@shantzis.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello all (and especially Carolyn),
>>>> 
>>>> I just want to say that I have the same question, specifically regarding
>>> the
>>>> GC/ARC issue.
>>>> 
>>>> The context in which this came up was very revealing. I had been
>>> developing a
>>>> fairly complex Cocoa project (ARC enabled) and decided that I had to add
>>> some tests.
>>>> Using MacRuby seemed like the natural solution. I quickly noticed,
>>> though, that I
>>>> couldn't.
>>>> 
>>>> Is there still any momentum behind MacRuby?  Is there any solution to
>>> the issue
>>>> of mixing it with ARC?  I really hope the answer to these two questions
>>> is "yes."
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Michael Shantzis
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On May 16, 2013, at 8:32 AM, Carolyn Ann Grant <
>>> carolyn.ann.gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi, I've got a question about the future of MacRuby. I like it, and
>>> have started working on a project or two using it, but I've been reading
>>> about GC and ARC, Ruby 2.0, RubyMotion and so on, and wonder where MacRuby
>>> is going? I'm quite concerned because I've put a good amount of time into
>>> my MacRuby projects.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I wish I had the knowledge and skill to help with MacRuby - I really do
>>> like it! - but unfortunately I don't. I also don't want to invest a lot of
>>> further time in MacRuby if it's not going anywhere. (And I really can't
>>> spare the $200 it would take to buy RubyMotion.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> I know this comes across as a bit impertinent, but I really would like
>>> to know what's happening with MacRuby development. Thanks!
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>>>>> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
>>>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>>>> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
>>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>>> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>>> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>>> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>>> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MacRuby-devel mailing list
> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel
_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macruby-devel

Reply via email to