For me, that's why I'd want to add Mobile Geo versus getting the trekker 
breeze for the same price. I played around with a friend's breeze once, but 
I just don't have people to take it around and program up places I might 
consider going if I knew what the route it makes might be like.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Howell" <s.how...@verizon.net>
To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: voice over comes to the I phone


>
> Yeah and it wouldn't cost $895, which quite frankly is a bit expensive
> in my opinion. And no, I'm not bashing anyone or Code Factory etc. I
> see the benefits of the software and for some $895 is well worth every
> dime and I can't argue that point. My hope is that maybe other options
> will become available that will be a little less expensive, that's all.
> On Jun 9, 2009, at 8:49 AM, Dan Eickmeier wrote:
>
>>
>> And what about that gps application that was demonstrated as part of
>> the WWDC keynote.  All the developer of that would have to do is make
>> that accessible with VO on the iPhone?  I'm assuming?
>> On Jun 9, 2009, at 8:44 AM, Larry Wanger wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> And, you've made the point. You have more choices and the main
>>> drivers
>>> behind your decision aren't what's accessible to you in the phone
>>> market, its what phone offers you what you need. And that my friend
>>> is
>>> what this is all about. You have another choice.
>>>
>>> Just as an FYI, you don't need iTunes once you get this set up. You
>>> need iTunes to get speech and other accessibility functions working
>>> on
>>> the phone for sure. But, after that, all bets are off. I know for a
>>> fact that there are 3rd party products out there that can allow you
>>> to
>>> sync your iPhone without ever using iTunes. In fact, I use one of
>>> those 3rd party products to sync up my Samsung right now. So, iTunes
>>> is not required.
>>>
>>> A BRF/Daisey reader, in due time I suspect. I'm sure that will
>>> happen.
>>> Like anything else, a developer just needs to step forward and do it.
>>>
>>> GPS solution for the blind? Who says that MobileGeo couldn't be
>>> written for the OS/phone platform? And, like the Windows based
>>> phones,
>>> I'm sure that through blue tooth you could use an independent GPS
>>> receiver as most of us do now.
>>>
>>> It is interesting that they don't mention Braille and I wonder about
>>> that feature as well. I don't use it but could see that being of
>>> value. So, maybe its in the works.
>>>
>>> However, nothing you've thrown out here seems impossible and, just
>>> like everyone else, you have a choice about what platform and phone
>>> you use.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 9, 2009, at 5:19 AM, erik burggraaf wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi guys,  I have to admit, when I read this, the sweat started
>>>> pouring
>>>> and the hart started thumping.  It was better than my third cup of
>>>> coffee in the morning which I'm still looking forward to with some
>>>> anticipation, smiles.  Speaking of which, one sec while I go pour
>>>> the
>>>> second one...
>>>>
>>>> OK, So here's why I won't be tossing my mobile speak pocket licence
>>>> in
>>>> the trash any time soon.
>>>>
>>>> First, I'm a scronnie, crabbie, and none too good-looking blind man.
>>>> An IPhone won't get me more girls, put 10 pounds of muscle on me in
>>>> exactly the right preportions, or make me a nicer person.  So forget
>>>> it for the time being at least.
>>>>
>>>> So far, we have no braille display support.  I haven't read anything
>>>> about a fully featured gps solution for the IPhone which I have to
>>>> have, or a brf reader which I don't have to have, but will use on
>>>> ocasion.  So it's really exciting to see the support coming along.
>>>> I'd love to fly down to the apple store and play with one for half
>>>> an
>>>> hour.  But I really use braille on my phone, and I really use a gps
>>>> system, and I won't be replacing my current set up until these
>>>> features are tested and true.
>>>>
>>>> So forgetting all the software you don't get, look at what you do
>>>> get...  ITunes.  You need ITunes to sync your calendar and
>>>> contacts?  ...seriously?  What happened to ISync?  Forget it.  I
>>>> can't
>>>> wait to get rid of my IPod, because the software I tried to replace
>>>> ITunes for syncing my music doesn't work and I'm sick of the whole
>>>> mess.  Why would I want to buy another device that forces me to
>>>> ITunes
>>>> to sync my calendar and contacts?  No thank you.  ITunes is getting
>>>> the old command option delete as soon as this IPod is gone.  Not
>>>> that
>>>> I have anything against the IPod. It's a beautiful machine.  My only
>>>> problems with it are that it dumps my library every time the battery
>>>> dies, and ITunes crashes whenever it tries to sync.  Oh, and ITunes
>>>> doesn't update my library properly, and it won't let me change the
>>>> settings for ripping/encoding cd's, and it corupts my library every
>>>> three months or so and makes me start all over again, and it fills
>>>> my
>>>> screen with all kinds of clutter I don't need, and Oh yeh, I
>>>> generally
>>>> hate being forced into using software that I don't like...  Fwew!
>>>>
>>>> So basicly I'll wait till I can have the functionality that I have
>>>> on
>>>> my I-Paq, especially gps navigation, braille support, and copy and
>>>> paste file transfers.
>>>>
>>>> Another thing the IPhone didn't have previously which I hope they've
>>>> fixed now is cdma support. It's got to have cdma support to be
>>>> really
>>>> viable here where CDMA is king.  I'm using gsm, and would be more
>>>> ore
>>>> less happy with it if my carrier didn't lie to me, price gouge me,
>>>> and
>>>> go behind my back at every turn.  I am counting down the days left
>>>> on
>>>> my contract so I can cut my rediculous sell phone bill.  There are
>>>> way
>>>> more CDMA carriers here than gsm though, in fact there are only two
>>>> gsm carriers here and they are both owned by the same company which
>>>> is
>>>> universally hated here.  It's not just me this time.  So, we have to
>>>> have cdma support if we want to make the IPhone attractive to the
>>>> %75
>>>> of us who don't use a gsm carrier here in ontario, and probably the
>>>> rest of canada as well.  Right now, the only supported platform that
>>>> runs on CDMA unless the new IPhone comes with CDMA support is
>>>> windows
>>>> mobile and mobile speak pocket/smartphone.  So that's what
>>>> technology
>>>> companies here are going to keep selling.  When orator and the
>>>> blackberry support comes it's going to be CDMA supported as well,
>>>> and
>>>> so we might go with that for people who don't want advanced screen
>>>> reader features.
>>>>
>>>> It is nice to see the stride finally taken in this area though.
>>>> Apple
>>>> accessibility is making finominal products, but the detracters will
>>>> never stop complaining that this that or the other device isn't
>>>> accessible, so Apple must be falling behind on it's committments or
>>>> they aren't really serious.  It's not for me, but I bet a number of
>>>> people who don't mind gsm carriers are going to be thrilled and it
>>>> would be fun to get one for demo purposes.
>>>>
>>>> Have fun,
>>>>
>>>> erik burggraaf
>>>> A+ sertified technician and user support consultant.
>>>> Phone: 888-255-5194
>>>> Email: e...@erik-burggraaf.com
>>>>
>>>> On 8-Jun-09, at 4:41 PM, ben mustill-rose wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Read.
>>>>> http://www.apple.com/accessibility/iphone/vision.html
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> >
>
>
> >
> 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to