Agree Chris,

I work with developers every day, as well ass with the business side. the true 
is that there is always things to implement. but I really think the matter is 
philosophical, if in matter of principal accessibility was there as a principal 
from the start of RND and in the business side and in the design/development 
process from the conception, accessibility would be less of a burden and not a 
matter of adding on.
I am just glad Apple chose to have accessibility as both a Marketing strategy 
as a rnd principal.
Hope others would take a similar approach.
Cheer up,
Rachel
On Sep 12, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Chris Blouch wrote:

> As I had mentioned in previous emails, the root issue is a philisophical one. 
> Good app developers want to write their code once. So when it came to 
> accessibility the Mozilla folks went to the open standard IAccessible2 APIs.
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAccessible2
> 
> That way any platform that went with this standard would get accessibility 
> and any platform "could" implement the standard if they wanted to. So Windows 
> and Linux did and Mozilla's apps are accessible there. Apple has implemented 
> their own accessibility API and basically told Mozilla to re-implement to 
> Apple's standards. Mozilla has refused saying Apple should just implement 
> IAccessible2. And so here we are with no accessibility because both sides 
> insist the other needs to do the work. I can't really blame Mozilla for 
> saying Apple should implement the open APIs for accessibility. At the same 
> time I'm sure Apple thinks their APIs are better and Mozilla just needs to 
> get with the program if they want to join the Apple ecosphere.
> 
> Not sure how many of you have actually worked with developers to get them to 
> do stuff to make their apps accessible but I'd say most just devs are unaware 
> or it isn't as high a priority as just getting the new features done. I 
> assume both Apple and Mozilla's engineers are of a similar bent that they 
> have 50 features to implement with time for only 10 and coming to them with 
> requests to drop more features to work on accessibility is a tough sell. That 
> said, Mozilla is open source so anyone who wants to could do the coding. I 
> think IBM funneled some money to Mozilla to make the IAccessible2 stuff 
> happen and I imagine Apple could do the same, but probably wont.
> 
> CB
> 
> On 9/11/11 4:05 PM, Eric Oyen wrote:
>> I find that rather interesting. now why would the general public (and 
>> business professionals) get the impression that mozilla was the most 
>> accessible web browser for any OS? sure it works well with windoweeyes and 
>> jaws in the windows platform. it also works mostly with orca in linux. it 
>> does not work at all in OS X with voiceover (and I have even tried growl 
>> with it and still had a lot of issues).
>> 
>> I have sent more than a few emails over the last few years and all I get 
>> back is nothing but a load of crapola and finger pointing. now I know we 
>> can't prevail upon a bunch of volunteer code monkeys and still have them do 
>> the work. if they were paid and we wrote the checks, that would certainly be 
>> a different case.
>> 
>> -Eric
>> On Sep 11, 2011, at 12:43 AM, Rachel magario wrote:
>> 
>>> the sad part is that loads of programers think firefox is the most 
>>> accessible browser out there. They get shocked to find it does not work on 
>>> the mac. I recall a programer at my work insisted that I should use 
>>> mozilla. Only after he tried using it  with  vo by him self,  was when the 
>>> message got across!
>>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to