Hi, Maybe because having libqt4-<Qt Module> is logic and clean. Note: I'm not the maintainer of these packages.
Br, Antonio On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Alex Myodov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I recently noticed that Freemantle SDK contains the QT packages with > outdated naming scheme only; libqt4-core package is available and stores > the libraries. Though Debian (as well as Diablo SDK, as the people > confirmed on IRC) has the new scheme, where the libraries are stored in > libqtcore4 while libqt4-core being the transitional package and having > the "depends" on libqtcore4. > Is anyone aware of any obscure reasons for that, and may/will it change > in Freemantle to be compliant with the other packages? > > > Thanks in advance, > Alex Myodov > _______________________________________________ > maemo-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers > -- Pablo Picasso<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/p/pablo_picasso.html> - "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
_______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
