Hi, Since debian/control files use placeholders for the binary dependencies that are filled during the building process there aren't compatibility issues.
Br, Antonio On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Alex Myodov <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe, an opposite direction package (libqtcore4 that depends on > libqt4-core) should be added then for compatibility, shouldn't it? > > Anyway, seems strange to have a different convention for the similar > (4.5) versions in Diablo and Fremantle. > > > Antonio Aloisio wrote: > > Hi, > > Maybe because having libqt4-<Qt Module> is logic and clean. > > > > Note: I'm not the maintainer of these packages. > > > > Br, > > Antonio > > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Alex Myodov <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I recently noticed that Freemantle SDK contains the QT packages with > > outdated naming scheme only; libqt4-core package is available and > stores > > the libraries. Though Debian (as well as Diablo SDK, as the people > > confirmed on IRC) has the new scheme, where the libraries are stored > in > > libqtcore4 while libqt4-core being the transitional package and > having > > the "depends" on libqtcore4. > > Is anyone aware of any obscure reasons for that, and may/will it > change > > in Freemantle to be compliant with the other packages? > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers > -- Jonathan Swift<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/jonathan_swift.html> - "May you live every day of your life."
_______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
