Maybe, an opposite direction package (libqtcore4 that depends on libqt4-core) should be added then for compatibility, shouldn't it?
Anyway, seems strange to have a different convention for the similar (4.5) versions in Diablo and Fremantle. Antonio Aloisio wrote: > Hi, > Maybe because having libqt4-<Qt Module> is logic and clean. > > Note: I'm not the maintainer of these packages. > > Br, > Antonio > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Alex Myodov <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hello, > > I recently noticed that Freemantle SDK contains the QT packages with > outdated naming scheme only; libqt4-core package is available and stores > the libraries. Though Debian (as well as Diablo SDK, as the people > confirmed on IRC) has the new scheme, where the libraries are stored in > libqtcore4 while libqt4-core being the transitional package and having > the "depends" on libqtcore4. > Is anyone aware of any obscure reasons for that, and may/will it change > in Freemantle to be compliant with the other packages? _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
