On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote: > nicolas vigier a écrit : >> >> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote: >> >>> nicolas vigier a écrit : >>>> >>>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Quote: Christiaan Welvaart wrote on Thu, 10 March 2011 23:26 >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, nicolas vigier wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Unfortunately the seamonkey name and logos are trademarked and the >>>>>> license >>>>>>>> terms are most likely not acceptable so it seems to me we'll have >>>>>> to >>>>>>>> rename/rebrand it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it different than firefox license terms ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Same rules AFAIK, see >>>>>> http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/policy.html >>> >>> Indeed, exactly the same rules. >>> >>>>> I don't see why we need to change the name. The policy says: >>>>> >>>>> "If you compile Mozilla unmodified source code (including code and config >>>>> files in the installer) and do not charge for it, you do not need >>>>> additional permission from Mozilla to use the relevant Mozilla Mark(s) for >>>>> your compiled version." >>>> > ... >>>> And it seems mandriva seamonkey package also has some patchs : >>>> http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/seamonkey/current/SOURCES/ >>> >>> These are mosty against obsolete versions of Seamonkey. (Which may predate >>> the current Mozilla policy.) >> >> This is the package for version 2.0.12, which is the latest version, >> released 2 weeks ago. Is this what you call an obsolete version ? > > Didn't notice that, about 5 pages down. And they were mostly localisation > modules, I assume unmodified. In any case, most correctives should be > available in (Mozilla) cvs.
I'm not talking localisation modules, I'm talking about the patches. And I doubt you will find anything interesting for new versions on Mozilla CVS as they have been using Mercurial for a few years now ...