nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote:
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, andre999 wrote:
nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Tux99 wrote:
Quote: Christiaan Welvaart wrote on Thu, 10 March 2011 23:26
----------------------------------------------------
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
Unfortunately the seamonkey name and logos are trademarked and the
license
terms are most likely not acceptable so it seems to me we'll have
to
rename/rebrand it.
Is it different than firefox license terms ?
Same rules AFAIK, see
http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/policy.html
Indeed, exactly the same rules.
I don't see why we need to change the name. The policy says:
"If you compile Mozilla unmodified source code (including code and config
files in the installer) and do not charge for it, you do not need
additional permission from Mozilla to use the relevant Mozilla Mark(s) for
your compiled version."
...
And it seems mandriva seamonkey package also has some patchs :
http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/seamonkey/current/SOURCES/
These are mosty against obsolete versions of Seamonkey. (Which may predate
the current Mozilla policy.)
This is the package for version 2.0.12, which is the latest version,
released 2 weeks ago. Is this what you call an obsolete version ?
Didn't notice that, about 5 pages down. And they were mostly localisation
modules, I assume unmodified. In any case, most correctives should be
available in (Mozilla) cvs.
I'm not talking localisation modules, I'm talking about the patches.
And I doubt you will find anything interesting for new versions on
Mozilla CVS as they have been using Mercurial for a few years now ...
The Mozilla pages still use the term cvs.
In any case, when I have pulled patches from their system, it was via
links in their bugzilla. So I didn't pay much attention to which
versioning system they use.
--
André
