Le mercredi 13 juillet 2011 11:17:31, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU a écrit : > Thanks. So I've got from 2 answers: > > You should use libmagick-devel > > and: > > Its' spec file must contain a virtual provides : > > Provides: libpoppler-qt4-devel > > Indeed, libmagick-devel, libwmf-devel, libchm-devel, libpoppler-qt4-devel, > etc. do expand/match/find_provides correctly on 64-bit too! > > But then *why* some names have to be written as: > qt4-devel and *not* libqt4-devel > python-devel and *not* libpython-devel > ? > Isn't this an inconsistency? > > Moreover, excuse me, but I find it stupid to have a 64-bit lib called > `libksane-devel`. This is its full 64-bit name, *not* the name from > BuildRequires! > It's another inconsistency IMHO. > > Of course, there is urpmq --provides to find out what resolves to the > needed devel library, but still... > > Thank you all! > > R-C aka beranger
Have you seen the discussion entitled "[Mageia-dev] Standardising the virtual Provides in -devel packages" from 5 days ago ? If Ahmad proposes to standardize them that means that we already know about some inconsistencies and want to improve this. Samuel
