On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Thomas Spuhler wrote: > On Saturday, September 24, 2011 01:49:13 pm Thomas Spuhler wrote: > > On Saturday, September 24, 2011 01:19:17 pm nicolas vigier wrote: > > > On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, nicolas vigier wrote: > > > > On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Thomas Spuhler wrote: > > > > > texi2html has no maintainer. > > > > > This package provides > > > > > Provides: tetex-texi2html = 1:3.0 > > > > > > > > > > Anybody getting hartburns if I chahnge that to > > > > > Provides: texi2html > > > > > > > > Why ? > > > > > > By the way texlive also provides texi2html. > > > > OK, I accept that. > a second thought, should we remove texi2html since texlive already provides > it.
Yes, either texi2html should be removed if it's already provided by texlive. Or the provide from texlive should be removed, if it's not really provided. > > But are you sure about texlive providing it? I don't know. It looks like it's not in the texlive package.
