D.Morgan a écrit : > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Jani Välimaa <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2011/9/27 Thomas Spuhler <[email protected]>: >>> On Monday, September 26, 2011 07:33:20 pm Thomas Spuhler wrote: >>>> On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:34:30 am Anssi Hannula wrote: >>>>> On 26.09.2011 15:47, nicolas vigier wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Thomas Spuhler wrote: >>>>>>> But are you sure about texlive providing it? >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't know. It looks like it's not in the texlive package. >>>>> >>>>> My impression (from a few years back I think) is that standalone >>>>> texi2html is the texlive-era replacement for tetex-texi2html. >>>> >>>> Since I need it for lilypond, I'll fix those requires that had a require >>>> for tetex-texi2html >>> it's also needed for gcomprise. It doesn't build without. >>> But here comes an interesting twist. >>> BuildRequires: texi2html in gcomprise is just being ignored, on the BS as >>> well >>> as on the local VM >>> Installing it let's me build the package, after uninstalling texi2html it >>> doesn't build, but the requires is ignored. >>> If I change it to something else such as BuildRequires: texi3html >>> Then it tells me rightfully texi2html is missing. >>> >> >> Your BR isn't ignored, texi2html is also provided by texlive and it >> gets installed instead of texi2html. >> > > i am working on new texlive, i can take a look to this issue. >
Olav Vitters has rebuilt texlive (with new libpng15) after boklm had erased the wrong Provides : texi2html Now, if BR texi2html is in a spec, texi2html.rpm will be installed You may now push ffmpeg, gcompris, to be built... You may try lilypond Remind that lash, qemu, and xen need to have BR modified from BR: tetex-texi2html to BR: texi2html too Olav Vitters seems to have taken care of quagga
