On Tuesday, September 27, 2011 03:49:56 pm Philippe DIDIER wrote: > D.Morgan a écrit : > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Jani Välimaa <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2011/9/27 Thomas Spuhler <[email protected]>: > >>> On Monday, September 26, 2011 07:33:20 pm Thomas Spuhler wrote: > >>>> On Monday, September 26, 2011 08:34:30 am Anssi Hannula wrote: > >>>>> On 26.09.2011 15:47, nicolas vigier wrote: > >>>>>> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Thomas Spuhler wrote: > >>>>>>> But are you sure about texlive providing it? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I don't know. It looks like it's not in the texlive package. > >>>>> > >>>>> My impression (from a few years back I think) is that standalone > >>>>> texi2html is the texlive-era replacement for tetex-texi2html. > >>>> > >>>> Since I need it for lilypond, I'll fix those requires that had a > >>>> require for tetex-texi2html > >>> > >>> it's also needed for gcomprise. It doesn't build without. > >>> But here comes an interesting twist. > >>> BuildRequires: texi2html in gcomprise is just being ignored, on the BS > >>> as well as on the local VM > >>> Installing it let's me build the package, after uninstalling texi2html > >>> it doesn't build, but the requires is ignored. > >>> If I change it to something else such as BuildRequires: texi3html > >>> Then it tells me rightfully texi2html is missing. > >> > >> Your BR isn't ignored, texi2html is also provided by texlive and it > >> gets installed instead of texi2html. > > > > i am working on new texlive, i can take a look to this issue. > > Olav Vitters has rebuilt texlive (with new libpng15) after boklm had > erased the wrong Provides : texi2html > > Now, if BR texi2html is in a spec, texi2html.rpm will be installed > > You may now push ffmpeg, gcompris, to be built... > You may try lilypond > > Remind that lash, qemu, and xen need to have BR modified > from BR: tetex-texi2html to BR: texi2html too > > Olav Vitters seems to have taken care of quagga
Thanks a lot. -- Thomas
