On 03/10/12 15:20, Sander Lepik wrote: > 03.10.2012 17:07, Guillaume Rousse kirjutas: >> Which means using 'nonfree' repository instead of 'tainted'... >> >> OK, let's vote here: >> - how many people for using 'tainted' ? >> - how many people for using 'non-free' ? >> >> Any solution involving technical changes doesn't qualify for a simple >> solution, and doesn't seems worth the effort for just a single package... >> > Well, you can't list 'non-free' as an option here as faac contains > content that belongs to tainted repo. If you land it there we will cause > problems for some mirrors and that is a no-go option. > > If you want to vote then we can vote between those options: > - land it in 'tainted' > - it remains excluded > > My vote goes to tainted. Yes, non-free and free packages will be mixed > but most users would vote for including it. Free software lovers can > just avoid it. They should be better informed than normal user anyway. > > -- > Sander >
I vote for tainted. I like Colin's idea too though. Claire
