03.10.2012 20:59, Christian Lohmaier skrev:
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Guillaume Rousse
<[email protected]> wrote:
OK, let's vote here:
- how many people for using 'tainted' ?
- how many people for using 'non-free' ?
Definitely vote for tainted.
The only question is whether packages that depend on tainted stuff as
a hard/non-optional dependency need to be themselves in tainted.
I don't care, but this is the next thing to consider.
Having stuff in free (and thus enabled for selection/installation by
default) depending on stuff from tainted (and thus non-installable,
since the media is not enabled/not checked for availability) might be
more problematic than having those packages in tainted.
this will never happed.
one of the base rules of core media is that it _must_ be selfcontained.
--
Thomas
