On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Guillaume Rousse <[email protected]> wrote: > > OK, let's vote here: > - how many people for using 'tainted' ? > - how many people for using 'non-free' ?
Definitely vote for tainted. The only question is whether packages that depend on tainted stuff as a hard/non-optional dependency need to be themselves in tainted. I don't care, but this is the next thing to consider. Having stuff in free (and thus enabled for selection/installation by default) depending on stuff from tainted (and thus non-installable, since the media is not enabled/not checked for availability) might be more problematic than having those packages in tainted. ciao Christian
