Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 22:17 +0200, Olav Dahlum a écrit : > On 08/06/11 21:55, Oliver Burger wrote: > > Olav Dahlum <[email protected]> schrieb am 08.06.2011 > >> Yes, I noticed the discussion about whether we should just use a > >> stock solution like Joomla, Drupal (7?), etc, to avoid spending > >> too much time on this. > > But this is not really a topic for i18n to decide... > > > > Oliver > > > > Of course, but you are involved in both, and did say it was important > to select one with proper i18n support. So I guess this should be > decided in union by both the web team and i18n, to maintain everyone's > needs. Just my opinion on this matter...
Proper i18n support should then be explained. Django, Catalyst, likely rails have support for .po and internationalisation, but maybe there is a better system somewhere ? Does any people here have experience with various websites translations system and some ideas to give ? -- Michael Scherer
