At Mon, 2 Aug 2010 11:27:42 -0700, Nathan Weizenbaum wrote: > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Phil Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> One quick note here I might make is that having these things >> abstracted like that means that should the fundamental architecture >> beneath magit change (I'm thinking of the new key binging system we've >> been promising ourselves) then we needn't change plugins when we >> switch over. [...] > I think it makes more sense to just let extensions upgrade to new > APIs when necessary. After all, there are only three extensions > (that I know of) right now, and the extension API will probably > more-or-less stabilize before there are many more. Yann - what do you think? Cheers, Phil
