Christopher Allan Webber <[email protected]> writes: > Rémi Vanicat writes: > >> I didn't use wazzup anymore, but I've already think about it, and I >> believe a solution would be to not update the buffer when one ignore a >> branch, but to just remove it, of visually mark it is now ignored, and >> wait for the user to explicitly update the buffer before doing it. It >> would make ignoring branch far less painful > > This would be helpful, though I think I need more than this. For > example, it's only easy to see something should be marked as ignorable > if it still shows up on my wazzap list. I'm writing this email in the > car, but for a repository with 336 branches it takes 7.5 seconds to run > merge-base on each of them, which effectively for all the branches that > don't show up and aren't explicitly ignored, is something that happens. > On my desktop I know I have about 4 times as many branches as > this... it's just way too much to manage. > > I've been thinking of writing a new mode which is basically like an > enhanced wazzap mode for people who are crazy like me and just have tons > and tons of branches to go through and review. I'm thinking of calling > it magit-reviewer. Basically, it would have these features: >
[...] I tend to agree that wazzup as it is now is not usable in some common case (when you want to review lot of branch), so I hope that your extension will improve things -- Rémi Vanicat
