Óscar Fuentes writes: > Óscar Fuentes <[email protected]> writes: > >> One thing that could work is to show the branches, mark those that >> diverged but do not gather the commits on advance, do so just when the >> user requires it, on a similar whay magit-status does: it shows the >> modified files but inspects and shows the difference only when the user >> ask for it. > > Oh, and one thing that does definitively wrong in wazzup is to show > history differences for tags. I think that tags should have no place in > wazzup.
I agree on tags. I'd be interested in getting that removed from magit-review. Patches welcome, seriously! I'm also interested in other optimization routes. I agree that there's no need to show the branches until you expand them. Would you be interested in helping me with this? - cwebb -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "magit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
