Jonas Bernoulli <[email protected]> writes: > Some of the drawbacks of the new workflow will vanish after making overdue > changes elsewhere. But some drawbacks are inherent to the use of > emacsclient.
Using emacsclient strikes me as wrong. If I understand things right from reading this list, you want Git to prepare the content of the commit message. Couldn't that be done by piping "git commit --dry-run" into the buffer? -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "magit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
